IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v139y2024i4p2525-2577..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowding in Private Quality: The Equilibrium Effects of Public Spending in Education

Author

Listed:
  • Tahir Andrabi
  • Natalie Bau
  • Jishnu Das
  • Naureen Karachiwalla
  • Asim Ijaz Khwaja

Abstract

We estimate the equilibrium effects of a public school grant program administered through school councils in Pakistani villages with multiple public and private schools and clearly defined catchment boundaries. The program was randomized at the village level, allowing us to estimate its causal impact on the market. Four years after the start of the program, test scores were 0.2 standard deviations higher in public schools. We find evidence of an education multiplier: test scores in private schools were also 0.2 standard deviations higher in treated markets. Consistent with standard models of product differentiation, the education multiplier is greater for those private schools that faced a greater threat to their market power. Accounting for private sector responses increases the program’s cost-effectiveness by 85% and affects how a policy maker would target spending. Given that markets with several public and private schools are now pervasive in low- and middle-income countries, prudent policy requires us to account for private sector responses to public policy, both in policies’ design and evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tahir Andrabi & Natalie Bau & Jishnu Das & Naureen Karachiwalla & Asim Ijaz Khwaja, 2024. "Crowding in Private Quality: The Equilibrium Effects of Public Spending in Education," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 139(4), pages 2525-2577.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:139:y:2024:i:4:p:2525-2577.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjae014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:139:y:2024:i:4:p:2525-2577.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.