IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v137y2023i4p2363-2418..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Army Service in the All-Volunteer Era

Author

Listed:
  • Kyle Greenberg
  • Matthew Gudgeon
  • Adam Isen
  • Corbin Miller
  • Richard Patterson

Abstract

Since the beginning of the all-volunteer era, millions of young Americans have chosen to enlist in the military. These volunteers disproportionately come from disadvantaged backgrounds, and while some aspects of military service are likely to be beneficial, exposure to violence and other elements of service could worsen outcomes. This article links the universe of army applicants between 1990 and 2011 to their federal tax records and other administrative data and uses two eligibility thresholds in the Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT) in a regression discontinuity design to estimate the effects of army enlistment on earnings and related outcomes. In the 19 years following application, army service increases average annual earnings by over 4,000 at both cutoffs. However, whether service increases long-run earnings varies significantly by race. Black servicemembers experience annual gains of 5,500 to 15,000 11–19 years after applying while white servicemembers do not experience significant changes. By providing Black servicemembers a stable and well-paying army job and by opening doors to higher-paid postservice employment, the army significantly closes the Black-white earnings gap in our sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyle Greenberg & Matthew Gudgeon & Adam Isen & Corbin Miller & Richard Patterson, 2023. "Army Service in the All-Volunteer Era," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(4), pages 2363-2418.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:137:y:2023:i:4:p:2363-2418.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjac026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:137:y:2023:i:4:p:2363-2418.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.