IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/polsoc/v43y2024i4p397-413..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A matter of culture? Conceptualizing and investigating “Evidence Cultures” within research on evidence-informed policymaking

Author

Listed:
  • Justyna Bandola-Gill
  • Niklas A Andersen
  • Rhodri Leng
  • Valérie Pattyn
  • Katherine E Smith

Abstract

This paper conceptualizes the notion of “evidence culture” in evidence-informed policymaking by surveying existing literature that either specifically employs the term or uses adjacent terms such as “epistemic” or “research culture”. It employs mixed-methods scoping review, combining citation analysis using Web of Science data used to identify the key clusters of scholarship with a qualitative thematic analysis of key papers across these clusters. This analysis identifies seven distinct approaches to “evidence cultures” across disciplinary communities. The key points of divergence across the clusters include the meanings of evidence, the underlying understanding of the evidence–policy interplay, the conceptualization of culture, and its implications for evidence use in policy. Building on these insights, we offer a framework for analyzing evidence cultures, arguing for the conceptual and empirical utility of this term in advancing scholarship on evidence use in policy settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Justyna Bandola-Gill & Niklas A Andersen & Rhodri Leng & Valérie Pattyn & Katherine E Smith, 2024. "A matter of culture? Conceptualizing and investigating “Evidence Cultures” within research on evidence-informed policymaking," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 43(4), pages 397-413.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:43:y:2024:i:4:p:397-413.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/polsoc/puae036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:43:y:2024:i:4:p:397-413.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.