IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxjlsj/v44y2024i4p755-779..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unconditional Love, Some Implications for the Law†

Author

Listed:
  • Anita L Allen

Abstract

Love is a rich topic for recent moral philosophers, theologians, writers and social justice activists. Yet, normative concepts of love embedded in modern law are seldom closely examined by legal theorists. This article is the first to illustrate that the concept of unconditional love plays significant roles across diverse areas of the positive law. Relying on a stipulated ethical understanding of unconditional love as a durable, constant, loyal, faithful, generous and self-sacrificing love, I demonstrate that, for better or worse, law can serve unconditional love’s paramount demands. Significant categories of contemporary legal regulation are explicable to the communities bound by them because the evocative notion that some familial love is and ought to be ‘unconditional’ is socially pervasive. I do not advocate for the problematic concept of unconditional love but demonstrate that the law embeds it in two ways. One way is by affording opportunities for individuals voluntarily to exercise the felt imperatives of unconditional love (eg through prison visitation rights and spousal testimonial privileges). The other is by imposing duties of unconditional love that may run strongly counter to individuals’ choices and preferences (eg by restricting access to safe abortion and requiring parental support of adult children). I suggest that derelict and gender-biased governments may shun their own social welfare responsibilities by imposing on private individuals caregiving duties that bespeak unconditional love. Attention to the powerful unconditional love concepts embedded throughout the law can foster an improved understanding of the norms and politics of marriage and family governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita L Allen, 2024. "Unconditional Love, Some Implications for the Law†," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 755-779.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:44:y:2024:i:4:p:755-779.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqae030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:44:y:2024:i:4:p:755-779.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ojls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.