IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxjlsj/v41y2021i4p1149-1172..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should We Protect Animals from Hate Speech?†

Author

Listed:
  • Josh Milburn
  • Alasdair Cochrane

Abstract

Laws against hate speech protect members of certain human groups. However, they do not offer protection to nonhuman animals. Using racist hate speech as our primary example, we explore the discrepancy between the legal response to hate speech targeting human groups and what might be called anti-animal or speciesist hate speech. We explore two sets of possible defences of this legal discrepancy drawn from the philosophical literature on hate speech—non-consequentialist and harm-based—and find both wanting. We thus conclude that, absent a compelling alternative argument, there is no in-principle reason to support the censure of racist hate speech but not the censure of speciesist hate speech.

Suggested Citation

  • Josh Milburn & Alasdair Cochrane, 2021. "Should We Protect Animals from Hate Speech?†," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 1149-1172.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:41:y:2021:i:4:p:1149-1172.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqab013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:41:y:2021:i:4:p:1149-1172.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ojls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.