IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxjlsj/v41y2021i4p1066-1095..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Lost Leg of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act (1999): Special Measures and Humane Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Samantha Fairclough

Abstract

This article examines the purpose behind the provision of special measures—adaptations to courtroom formalities—to vulnerable or intimidated people giving evidence in criminal trials. It shows that fostering the principle of humane treatment and improving evidence quality were the initial motivations underpinning the introduction of special measures. The focus in this article is on the principle of humane treatment, and whether the current provision of special measures successfully fosters it. The article conceptualises the principle of humane treatment so that it can be used as the normative measure against which to evaluate the current provision of special measures to vulnerable witnesses and the accused. It concludes that the solely instrumental legal basis on which special measures are currently available risks insufficiently protecting vulnerable or intimidated participants from the harm and distress that the criminal trial often causes, and that this can amount to inhumane treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Samantha Fairclough, 2021. "The Lost Leg of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act (1999): Special Measures and Humane Treatment," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 1066-1095.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:41:y:2021:i:4:p:1066-1095.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqab014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:41:y:2021:i:4:p:1066-1095.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ojls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.