IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v35y2019i3p368-395..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas McGregor
  • Brock Smith
  • Samuel Wills

Abstract

Inequality is important, both for its own sake and for its political, social, and economic implications. However, measuring inequality is not straightforward, as it requires decisions to be made on the variable, population, and distributional characteristics of interest. These decisions will naturally influence the conclusions that are drawn so they must be closely linked to an underlying purpose, which is ultimately defined by a social welfare function. This paper outlines important considerations when making each of these decisions, before surveying recent advances in measuring inequality and suggesting avenues for future work.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas McGregor & Brock Smith & Samuel Wills, 2019. "Measuring inequality," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 368-395.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:35:y:2019:i:3:p:368-395.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grz015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dorothee Hillrichs & Gonzague Vannoorenberghe, 2021. "Recovering Within-Country Inequality From Trade Data," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2021014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    2. Lachlan Johnson & Richard Eccleston, 2023. "Interrogating inclusive growth: Implications for conceptualisation, measurement and policy practice," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 362-376, June.
    3. Radatz, Laura & Baten, Joerg, 2023. "Measuring Multidimensional Inequality and Conflict in Africa and in a Global Comparison," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277637, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Thitithep Sitthiyot & Kanyarat Holasut, 2020. "A simple method for measuring inequality," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Philip Arestis & Peter Phelps, 2023. "Local Financial Institutions and Income Inequality: Evidence from Brazil's Credit Cooperative Movement," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(4), pages 739-779, July.
    6. Andrzej Tucki & Korneliusz Pylak, 2021. "Collective or Individual? What Types of Tourism Reduce Economic Inequality in Peripheral Regions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Nguyen, Hien Phuc & Khieu, Hoang, 2021. "Progressive wealth tax: An inquiry into Biden’s tax policy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 735-742.
    8. George Petrakos & Kostas Rontos & Luca Salvati & Chara Vavoura & Ioannis Vavouras, 2024. "Income Inequality in the Over-Indebted Eurozone Countries and the Role of the Excessive Deficit Procedure," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 301-322, April.
    9. Blotevogel, Robert & Imamoglu, Eslem & Moriyama, Kenji & Sarr, Babacar, 2022. "Income inequality measures and economic growth channels," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Panagiotis Konstantinou & Anastasios Rizos & Artemis Stratopoulou, 2022. "Macroprudential policies and income inequality in former transition economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 1005-1062, May.
    11. Dagim Tadesse Bekele, 2020. "Effect of Macroeconomic, Demographic, and Governance Factors on Income Inequality of Selected sub-Saharan Africa Countries," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 9(1), pages 60-70, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:35:y:2019:i:3:p:368-395.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.