IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v32y2016i1p41-63..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using economic analysis in health workforce policy-making

Author

Listed:
  • Edson C. Araujo
  • Timothy Grant Evans
  • Akiko Maeda

Abstract

The health workforce is an essential component in building responsive and efficient health care systems. Yet despite its importance, it remains in many countries the weakest building block of the health system and a major constraint to achieving universal health coverage goals. Most countries face either absolute shortages (not enough health workers) or relative shortages (skills imbalances)—sometimes both. Countries also face maldistribution, inadequate training capacity and a weak knowledge base, negative work environments, weak human resources management systems, poor working conditions, and inadequate financial and non-financial incentives. There is growing consensus among researchers, practitioners, and the research community that many of these problems have labour market roots. This paper reviews the main economic issues around key health workforce challenges and discusses the contributions that economic analysis can make to health workforce policy-making. It adopts a labour market framework to address the service delivery challenges countries face due to health workforce bottlenecks, and discusses the importance and contribution of the health workforce to general employment and economic growth. The use of an explicit economic framework helps to define policy responses that go beyond scaling up health workers’ training, highlighting the importance also of the roles of incentives, preferences, and market failures.

Suggested Citation

  • Edson C. Araujo & Timothy Grant Evans & Akiko Maeda, 2016. "Using economic analysis in health workforce policy-making," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 41-63.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:41-63.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grw001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:41-63.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.