IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v30y2014i2p392-405..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition costs in secessions, with a brief application to Scotland

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Young

Abstract

This article demonstrates that the costs incurred in the process of a region becoming a sovereign state can be large enough to outweigh the long-term material benefits of independence. Transition costs consist of transaction costs, fiscal costs, and the cost of uncertainty. Their size depends crucially on whether the politics of the transition are cooperative. Game theory, however, shows that there are incentives for threats of non-cooperation and for the exercise of such threats. These considerations are applied, briefly, to the debate about Scottish independence. This includes a short analysis of how transition costs can be reduced. A final section inquires about possible transition benefits, which can consist of solidarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Young, 2014. "Transition costs in secessions, with a brief application to Scotland," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 392-405.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:30:y:2014:i:2:p:392-405.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/gru015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:30:y:2014:i:2:p:392-405.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.