Author
Abstract
The global economic crisis of 2008–9 followed by the euro area sovereign debt crisis of 2011–12 has revealed the need for global rebalancing. Economies with current account surpluses need to increase domestic demand, while deficit countries need to reduce their deficits by boosting exports through productivity gains. India falls within the deficit category, having suffered both current account and fiscal deficits that have persisted over recent years. A dearth of adequate structural reform underlies India’s macroeconomic imbalances. Analysis reveals that current account surplus economies tend to experience comparative advantage in their goods sector while deficit countries have comparative advantage in the services sector. The question posed is whether liberalizing the services sector would reap dynamic benefits by enhancing services exports and containing India’s deficit. Opening up the services sector could, however, have opposing effects. On the one hand, it would support greater export of services, thereby reducing the current account deficit. On the other, the probable rise in foreign participation would translate to an increase in imports. The paper argues that the former effect is likely to prevail since structural reform in the services sector has the potential to reduce inefficiencies created by trade and capital flow restrictions. Reform would improve resource allocation, increase investment opportunities and enhance economic growth. Further, while the initial phase of foreign entrants would imply increased imports, in the medium term, successful joint ventures are likely to spread out internationally with positive ramifications for exports. Solutions in India are to be found in liberalizing, among others, the financial—including banking and insurance—sector, as well as retail trade, though its achievement will not be easy. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Parthasarathi Shome, 2013.
"Rebalancing and structural policies—an Indian perspective,"
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 28(3), pages 587-602, AUTUMN.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:oxford:v:28:y:2013:i:3:p:587-602
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:28:y:2013:i:3:p:587-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.