IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v19y2003i1p161-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complementing EMU: Rethinking Cohesion Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Iain Begg

Abstract

Under EMU, the less competitive regions of the EU--usually assumed to be peripheral--have been widely expected to lose ground, yet it is the core of the EU that, so far, has appeared to have suffered from the advent of the euro. This paper looks at the processes behind regional divergence in the EU, and presents evidence on recent and prospective trends as EMU is consolidated. Bearing in mind that the imminent enlargement of the EU will radically change the political economy of the EU's efforts to assure 'cohesion', policy issues are then discussed. Looking forward to the next renegotiation of the Structural Funds, it is argued that difficult decisions have to be taken about the extent and character of EU policy. The option of an open method of coordination for cohesion policy is put forward as a means of resolving some of the hard choices. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Iain Begg, 2003. "Complementing EMU: Rethinking Cohesion Policy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 161-179.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:19:y:2003:i:1:p:161-179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikos Christodoulakis, 2009. "Ten Years Of Emu: Convergence, Divergence And New Policy Priorities," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 208(1), pages 86-100, April.
    2. Nigel Pain & Desirée Van Welsum, 2003. "Untying The Gordian Knot: The Multiple Links Between Exchange Rates and Foreign Direct Investment," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 823-846, December.
    3. Iain Begg, 2008. "Structural policy and economic convergence," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 9(1), pages 3-9, April.
    4. Rodriguez-Oreggia, Eduardo & Rodriguez-Pose, Andres, 2004. "The Regional Returns of Public Investment Policies in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1545-1562, September.
    5. Mikos, Maria, 2019. "Zasięg dyfuzji bodźców gospodarczych– testowanie modelu rdzeń–peryferia w odniesieniu do kohezyjnej polityki regionalnej i lokalnej," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 1-33, April.
    6. Golemanova, Antoaneta & Kuhar, Ales, 2007. "Post-Accession Opportunities for Rural Development in Bulgaria," 100th Seminar, June 21-23, 2007, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro 162397, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Iain Begg, 2008. "Structural policy and economic convergence," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 9(01), pages 3-9, April.
    8. Hansen, Heiko & Herrmann, Roland, 2012. "The two dimensions of policy impacts on economic cohesion: Concept and illustration for the CAP," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 483-491.
    9. Florence Bouvet, 2010. "EMU and the dynamics of regional per capita income inequality in Europe," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 8(3), pages 323-344, September.
    10. Petrakos, George & Dimitris, Kallioras & Ageliki, Anagnostou, 2007. "A Generalized Model of Regional Economic Growth in the European Union," Papers DYNREG12, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:19:y:2003:i:1:p:161-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.