IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v11y1995i4p70-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal Decentralization and Growing Regional Disparities in Rural China: Some Evidence in the Provision of Social Services

Author

Listed:
  • West, Loraine A
  • Wong, Christine P W

Abstract

This paper provides evidence of inter-regional and inter-sectoral inequality in China by comparing local government provision of social services. An examination of a number of education and health status indicators reveals large disparities in the level and quality of service provision across regions, with service provision in poorer regions falling far short of targets enunciated in state policy. Fiscal centralization has weakened the capacity of government to effect equalization across regions. As the fiscal system moved towards self-financing, fiscal pressures particularly intensified for the county level, whose expenditure burdens have generally been increasing. With higher level governments themselves under severe fiscal strain and in no position to subsidize services, rural governments are forced to seek supplementary funding off budget, by imposing a variety of fees and levies. In poor regions, however, access to off-budget resources is limited, resulting in lower levels of service provided and amplification of regional inequalities. Copyright 1995 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • West, Loraine A & Wong, Christine P W, 1995. "Fiscal Decentralization and Growing Regional Disparities in Rural China: Some Evidence in the Provision of Social Services," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 11(4), pages 70-84, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:11:y:1995:i:4:p:70-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:11:y:1995:i:4:p:70-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.