IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v74y2022i1p265-296..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-parametric estimation and evaluation of capability sets
[Gender differences in Italian children's capabilities]

Author

Listed:
  • Pim Verbunt
  • Nicky Rogge
  • Tom Van Puyenbroeck

Abstract

A major difficulty for the application of Amartya Sen’s capability approach is that individual capability sets cannot readily be observed. This article proposes a non-parametric framework to construct such sets, on the basis of observed functionings of individuals that are taken to belong to a group sharing the same capability set. Within this framework, the earlier theoretical proposals of Muellbauer to compare different capability sets can be easily implemented. Associated robust empirical estimators are provided and applied to EU-SILC data on household income, material living conditions, housing quality and health; we illustrate our approach with a multilateral comparison of 32 European countries, with a comparison of both a ‘fixed ray’ and a ‘multiple rays’ evaluation metric to compare French and German capability sets, and with a multilateral comparison of socioeconomic sub-groups in France.

Suggested Citation

  • Pim Verbunt & Nicky Rogge & Tom Van Puyenbroeck, 2022. "Non-parametric estimation and evaluation of capability sets [Gender differences in Italian children's capabilities]," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(1), pages 265-296.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:74:y:2022:i:1:p:265-296.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpaa029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicky Rogge & Alena Kolyaseva, 2022. "Measuring and comparing World Bank regions’ ‘ease of doing business’ opportunity sets," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 131-155, April.
    2. Perrine Dehaspe & Nicky Rogge, 2023. "The gender-equal Union? Measuring female (dis)advantage and achievement in European Union Member States using a benefit-of-the-doubt framework," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 129-145, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:74:y:2022:i:1:p:265-296.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.