IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v55y2003i1p25-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does tighter environmental policy lead to a comparative advantage in less polluting goods?

Author

Listed:
  • Swee Chua

Abstract

A two-factor model is developed to analyze the effects of environmental policy on patterns of comparative advantage. A pollution tax affects goods' prices via: (1) the tax burdens on each good, which depend on their respective polluting tendencies; and (2) changes in factor returns due to increased abatement activity. The good intensive in the factor whose returns have risen will tend to face a price increase, ceteris paribus. The net outcome depends on both effects. A higher tax will not always raise (lower) the autarky price of the more (less) polluting good. Therefore a country with the higher (lower) tax does not always have a comparative advantage in the less (more) polluting good. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Swee Chua, 2003. "Does tighter environmental policy lead to a comparative advantage in less polluting goods?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 55(1), pages 25-35, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:55:y:2003:i:1:p:25-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frankel, Jeffrey A., 2009. "Environmental Effects of International Trade," Scholarly Articles 4481652, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Chang, Juin-Jen & Wang, Wei-Neng & Shieh, Jhy-Yuan, 2018. "Environmental rebounds/backfires: Macroeconomic implications for the promotion of environmentally-friendly products," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 35-68.
    3. Kenji Kondo, 2013. "Renewable Resources, Environmental Pollution, and International Migration," ERSA conference papers ersa13p33, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Sakamoto, Tomoyuki & Managi, Shunsuke, 2017. "New evidence of environmental efficiency on the export performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 615-626.
    5. Yasuyuki Sugiyama & Muneyuki Saito, 2016. "Environmental Goods and Measures for Their Promotion: An Analysis Using a Fair Wage Model," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 581-602, December.
    6. Elliott, Joshua & Fullerton, Don, 2014. "Can a unilateral carbon tax reduce emissions elsewhere?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 6-21.
    7. Cai, Jie & Stoyanov, Andrey, 2023. "Progressive income tax and comparative advantage in trade," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Bourgeon, Jean-Marc & Ollivier, Hélène, 2012. "Is bioenergy trade good for the environment?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 411-421.
    9. McAusland, Carol, 2008. "Trade, politics, and the environment: Tailpipe vs. smokestack," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 52-71, January.
    10. Fullerton, Don & Heutel, Garth, 2007. "The general equilibrium incidence of environmental taxes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3-4), pages 571-591, April.
    11. Nicola Coniglio & Kenji Kondoh, 2012. "Subsidy to environmental industry in a North-South model of trans-boundary pollution, trade and migration," ERSA conference papers ersa12p74, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Don Fullerton & Garth Heutel, 2010. "The General Equilibrium Incidence of Environmental Mandates," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 2(3), pages 64-89, August.
    13. McAusland, Carol, 2021. "Carbon taxes and footprint leakage: Spoilsport effects," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    14. Kathy Baylis & Don Fullerton & Daniel H. Karney, 2014. "Negative Leakage," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 51-73.
    15. Xiao Chen & Alan Woodland, 2013. "International trade and climate change," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(3), pages 381-413, June.
    16. Catia Montagna & Avanti Nisha Pinto & Nikolaos Vlassis, 2020. "Welfare and Trade Effects of International Environmental Agreements," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(2), pages 331-345, July.
    17. Chi-Chur Chao & Eden S. H. Yu, 2015. "Environmental Impacts of Tariff and Tax Reforms Under Origin and Destination Principles," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 310-322, May.
    18. McGinty Matthew, 2008. "An Evolutionary Race to the Top: Trade, Oligopoly and Convex Pollution Damage," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Don Fullerton & Daniel H. Karney, 2018. "Potential State‐Level Carbon Revenue Under The Clean Power Plan," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 36(1), pages 149-166, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:55:y:2003:i:1:p:25-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.