IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v49y1997i1p21-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploiting an Advantage--Declining an Advantage

Author

Listed:
  • Burdett, Ken
  • Walsh, John

Abstract

Within the context of the study, a firm is said to have an advantage over another if it obtains more customers given they both charge the same price. Further, consumer switching costs imply the larger the difference in the prices charged by the two firms the greater the proportion of consumers who switch from the higher-priced firm to the lower-priced one. The Nash equilibrium to the price-posting game is characterized. The firm with the advantage charges a higher price. Finally, it is shown that if one firm can freely choose to have an advantage, it will reject it. This follows as the greater the advantage, the smaller the equilibrium profits to both firms. Copyright 1997 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Burdett, Ken & Walsh, John, 1997. "Exploiting an Advantage--Declining an Advantage," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 21-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:49:y:1997:i:1:p:21-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-7653%28199701%292%3A49%3A1%3C21%3AEAAAA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:49:y:1997:i:1:p:21-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.