IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jleorg/v39y2023i1p1-26..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judicial Review by the People Themselves: Democracy and the Rule of Law in Ancient Athens

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Carugati
  • Randall Calvert
  • Barry R Weingast

Abstract

Modern democratic constitutions mediate the tension between democracy and the rule of law through institutions that check unrestrained popular rule with expert judicial bodies. This paper considers the alternative arrangement that existed in ancient Athens, where checks on popular rule coexisted with strong popular control. Judicial review in Athens, however, raised two additional threats to democracy and the rule of law: unpredictability and partisanship. We combine a formal model with historical exegesis to show how the strategic incentives of Athenian institutional design, along with a strong societal consensus on the value of constitutional democracy, were necessary ingredients for dispelling both threats. In Athens, institutions responsive to citizens’ demands existed alongside a robust rule of law. This case study provides empirical evidence allowing us to reflect on the feasibility of extensive democratic input to the process of constitutional review. [JEL: H11—structure, scope, and performance of government; K40—legal procedure, the legal system, and illegal behavior (general)]

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Carugati & Randall Calvert & Barry R Weingast, 2023. "Judicial Review by the People Themselves: Democracy and the Rule of Law in Ancient Athens," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 1-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:39:y:2023:i:1:p:1-26.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/ewab033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:39:y:2023:i:1:p:1-26.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jleo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.