IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jleorg/v38y2022i1p161-195..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Watches the Watchmen: Evidence of the Effect of Body-Worn Cameras on New York City Policing

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell E Zamoff
  • Brad N Greenwood
  • Gordon Burtch

Abstract

We present a multi-year study of the rollout of Body-Worn Cameras (BWCs) to the New York City Police Department (NYPD). Our study adds to the prior body of work by clarifying some of the discord within it, particularly with respect to large urban police departments. We estimate the effect of BWC deployment on precinct volumes of citizen stops, arrests, complaints against officers, and use-of-force incidents. Results indicate that BWCs drive significant increases in stops and decreases in arrests and citizen complaints. We observe no effect on use of force. We also document heterogeneity in affected stops and complaints. Our findings speak to three potential benefits of BWCs in urban law enforcement: an increase in legitimate stops made by police; a decrease in complaints alleging officers’ abuse of authority; and a reduction in arrests (which appears beneficial, regardless of whether this results from improved behavior among police or citizens).

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell E Zamoff & Brad N Greenwood & Gordon Burtch, 2022. "Who Watches the Watchmen: Evidence of the Effect of Body-Worn Cameras on New York City Policing," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 161-195.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:38:y:2022:i:1:p:161-195.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/ewab026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:38:y:2022:i:1:p:161-195.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jleo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.