IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jleorg/v16y2000i1p74-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common Law Exceptions to Employment at Will and U.S. Labor Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Miles, Thomas J

Abstract

Employment relationships in the United States were historically governed by the common law doctrine of employment at will. Under this rule, parties to an employment relationship could, in the absence of an explicit contract, unilaterally terminate the match at any time, for any reason, and without penalty. In recent decades. numerous state courts have recognized "exceptions" to employment at will that limit the circumstances of worker dismissal. Using a panel of state labor market aggregates from 1965 to 1994, this article examines the effect of these exceptions on U.S. labor markets. These exceptions are seen to have no effect on aggregate employment nor unemployment. However, temporary employment is observed to increase by a statistically significant 15% following the adoption of an exception. The implied contract exception, in particular, appears to be responsible for this increase. Copyright 2000 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Miles, Thomas J, 2000. "Common Law Exceptions to Employment at Will and U.S. Labor Markets," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 74-101, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:74-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:74-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jleo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.