IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v19y2024i6p541-546..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inspiration or infringement? Social media ‘viral’ trends: a case study on TikTok

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Galea

Abstract

Short-form videos have recently gained popularity thanks to social media platforms like TikTok. Some of the videos created by users go ‘viral’ and are ‘reproduced’ by others as they become trends on this platform.This article examines whether viral social media trends can warrant copyright protection and whether, by recreating such trends without permission, a potential infringement takes place. The idea–expression dichotomy will form the basis of the analysis so that the question is whether the infringer merely borrows an unprotected idea or rather copies a protectable expression.Additionally, as hinted in the pending referral in Mio (C-580/23), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is yet to determine how the assessment of similarity, when examining an alleged infringement, must be conducted—is this one of recognizability or rather overall impression? Exceptions and limitations—most pertinently, pastiche—also form part of the discussion as questions are raised on the application of this undefined concept, pending the judgment in Pelham II (C-590/23).A balancing approach shall be taken between the interests of the different stakeholders at hand, including having regard to freedom of expression and protection of IP.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Galea, 2024. "Inspiration or infringement? Social media ‘viral’ trends: a case study on TikTok," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 541-546.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:6:p:541-546.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpae038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:6:p:541-546.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.