IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v19y2024i3p206-216..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Round-up of national decisions on online intermediaries and platforms 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Petr Kalenský
  • Taimr Martin
  • Aada Tolva-nen
  • Géraldine Arbant
  • Edouard Trep-poz
  • Pava Vrhovac
  • Adél Gelencsér
  • Bálint Halász
  • Federico Manstretta
  • Andrea Vantini
  • Clemens Molle
  • Manon Rieger-Jansen
  • David Fuentes Lahoz
  • Marta Arteaga

Abstract

Online enforcement of intellectual property rights has for a long time relied on the involvement of online intermediaries and platforms. Besides injunctions against ‘innocent’ intermediaries, questions surrounding the type of and conditions for establishing liability of online intermediaries and platforms have also gained increasing prominence. In Europe, for example, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has repeatedly tackled these issues. European Union (EU) legislature has also legislated in this area: on the one hand, Article 17 of Directive 2019/790 is premised on the direct responsibility of certain types of online platforms—online content sharing service providers—for user-uploaded content; on the other hand, the Digital Services Act (Regulation 2022/2065), while reiterating the importance of safe harbours for online intermediaries, has introduced due diligence and transparency obligations that are not premised on any liability of their addressees.In 2023, national courts in Australia, Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain delivered a series of important rulings in connection with the treatment of online intermediaries and platforms This contribution provides a round-up of the most significant judgments issued in the period 1 January to 31 December 2023, with a special focus on copyright.The analysis is divided by area (liability of online intermediaries and platforms, enforcement aspects and other issues) and country (Australia, the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain).

Suggested Citation

  • Petr Kalenský & Taimr Martin & Aada Tolva-nen & Géraldine Arbant & Edouard Trep-poz & Pava Vrhovac & Adél Gelencsér & Bálint Halász & Federico Manstretta & Andrea Vantini & Clemens Molle & Manon Riege, 2024. "Round-up of national decisions on online intermediaries and platforms 2023," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 206-216.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:3:p:206-216.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpad120
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:3:p:206-216.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.