IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v19y2024i2p90-100..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Law(s) against unfair competition: the legitimacy of the UK approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dev Saif Gangjee

Abstract

The UK lacks a unified legal basis for the prevention of unfair competition. Instead, the UK offers up an unfair competition menu consisting of individual torts or equitable wrongs (primarily passing off, injurious falsehood, defamation and the breach of confidence), the prohibition of misleading practices under consumer protection law, trade mark law and codes of advertising regulation.In terms of their cumulative coverage, these regimes overlap considerably with the protection available under civilian unfair competition regimes. It is therefore more accurate to say that the UK has laws against unfair competition. But are they cumulatively sufficient?This article evaluates one important facet of this question—whether the UK approach complies with relevant international treaty obligations contained in Article10bis of the Paris Convention—concluding that it does. The basis for this conclusion is the detailed analysis of international unfair competition prevention obligations contained in WTO Dispute Settlement Panel Report, Australia—Tobacco Plain Packaging.

Suggested Citation

  • Dev Saif Gangjee, 2024. "Law(s) against unfair competition: the legitimacy of the UK approach," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 90-100.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:90-100.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpad105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:90-100.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.