IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v19y2024i1p64-75..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of FRAND royalty rates: an examination of prominent SEP cases

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Effraimidis
  • Dan Werner
  • Kristopher Boushie

Abstract

Technology standards are critical in creating a common interface, allowing interoperability between individual components, devices and networks. Technology standards often incorporate many essential patented inventions, which are referred to as standard-essential patents (SEPs). Owners of declared SEPs provide commitments to standard setting organizations (SSOs) that they will license their SEPs on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to companies that practice the standards.However, it is sometimes disputed whether or not these royalty rates are FRAND; in these cases, the burden of determining a FRAND royalty falls to courts. It is important for parties involved in SEP litigation to be knowledgeable of the appropriate economic tools and models to address the various issues arising in these unique and challenging patent disputes.This article discusses how various approaches to patent valuation have been applied in prominent SEP cases over the last decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Effraimidis & Dan Werner & Kristopher Boushie, 2024. "Determination of FRAND royalty rates: an examination of prominent SEP cases," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 64-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:64-75.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpad112
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:64-75.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.