IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v16y2021i6p457-468..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Rules it can interpret contracts: rejects Goldilocks approach to jurisdiction Salt Canada Inc v Baker, 2020 FCA 127, 28 July 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Emir Crowne

Abstract

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal ruled that it can interpret contracts without resorting to the ‘Goldilocks approach to jurisdiction, taste-testing each case for the appropriate amount of federal flavour and asserting jurisdiction only in cases where the federal content is, in the personal opinion of a judge, “just right”.’

Suggested Citation

  • Emir Crowne, 2021. "Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Rules it can interpret contracts: rejects Goldilocks approach to jurisdiction Salt Canada Inc v Baker, 2020 FCA 127, 28 July 2020," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(6), pages 457-468.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:457-468.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa196
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:457-468.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.