IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v8y2005i4p803-824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Authoritative Interpretation Under Article IX:2 of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization: Current Law, Practice and Possible Improvements

Author

Listed:
  • Claus-Dieter Ehlermann
  • Lothar Ehring

Abstract

The Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization reserves the right to adopt 'authoritative interpretations' of the multilateral trade agreements to the Ministerial Conference and the General Council. Given that, to date, this instrument has not been used, the present article intends to highlight its structural importance for the balance of powers within the legal system of the World Trade Organization. It identifies the use that could and should be made of it and reviews the practice so far. The article attempts to explain the reasons for the present lack of authoritative interpretations in the World Trade Organization and presents several options for the future. At the outset, this article explores the parameters that are relevant for this discussion, notably the possible scope and legal effects of an authoritative interpretation. Important questions are whether an authoritative interpretation is legally binding on all WTO Members, whether it may modify the existing law or whether the rules of treaty interpretation are relevant in the formulation of an authoritative interpretation, and whether its validity can be challenged in dispute settlement. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Claus-Dieter Ehlermann & Lothar Ehring, 2005. "The Authoritative Interpretation Under Article IX:2 of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization: Current Law, Practice and Possible Improvements," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 803-824, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:8:y:2005:i:4:p:803-824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:8:y:2005:i:4:p:803-824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.