IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v27y2024i4p706-722..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compatibility of emerging AI regulation with GATS and TBT: the EU Artificial Intelligence Act

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Soprana

Abstract

Governments have recently started to design policies that are specific to artificial intelligence (AI), which is projected to become the dominant technology in the decades to come. AI is increasingly permeating all aspects of the digital economy, including trade in goods and services, giving rise to concerns whether emerging AI-specific regulation may run afoul of international economic law (IEL). However, studies on the law of the World Trade Organization have yet to pay close attention to the European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), the first binding regulation of its kind in the world. This paper seeks to address this gap in the literature. It examines the compatibility of emerging AI regulation with multilateral trade rules, using the EU AI Act as a case study. More specifically, it analyses to what extent the EU AI Act’s disciplines on prohibited AI systems are likely to violate the EU’s existing obligations and commitments enshrined in the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade and the General Agreement on Trade in Services. This paper demonstrates that there is potential for conflict between the EU regulation and these two multilateral trade agreements. It also suggests that, although emerging AI regulation can represent a challenge for the future of IEL, the latter can play a role in guiding and shaping AI-specific regulation moving forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Soprana, 2024. "Compatibility of emerging AI regulation with GATS and TBT: the EU Artificial Intelligence Act," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 706-722.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:27:y:2024:i:4:p:706-722.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgae040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:27:y:2024:i:4:p:706-722.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.