IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v19y2016i2p417-444..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Security Exceptions in the WTO System: Bridge or Bottle-Neck for Trade and Security?

Author

Listed:
  • Ji Yeong Yoo
  • Dukgeun Ahn

Abstract

The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Article XXI remains intact, without any modification, since the inception of the GATT in 1947. Recent economic and political developments, however, are not well addressed in the Security Exceptions enshrined in Article XXI. Moreover, the security exceptions that have been incorporated into the General Agreement on Trade in Services and the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement feature some discrepancies as compared to the text in the GATT, which causes confusion. Some free trade agreements have occasionally introduced security exception provisions as well, with notable distinctions compared to those of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The current world trading system has to deal with wholly different dimensions of national security such as cyber-security, terrorism, and energy security. This situation raises an imminent question on how to make those arcane security exception provisions effectively workable legal disciplines. This article examines legal developments in WTO and Free Trade Agreement security exceptions and diagnoses the systematic challenges to effectively apply the Security Exceptions. The WTO Members need to address this issue as early as possible to avoid an unnecessary and inappropriate burden for the dispute settlement system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji Yeong Yoo & Dukgeun Ahn, 2016. "Security Exceptions in the WTO System: Bridge or Bottle-Neck for Trade and Security?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 417-444.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:417-444.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgw049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:417-444.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.