IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v19y2016i1p91-120..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual Property Rights as Protected Investments: How Open are the Gates?

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Correa
  • Jorge E. Viñuales

Abstract

The protection afforded to different legally-defined objects may overlap when different regimes apply to the same object. This article focuses on the overlap of two protective regimes, intellectual property rights (IPRs) and international investment agreements (IIAs), as applied to certain intangible objects, such as an invention, a distinctive mark or the expression of an artistic work. More specifically, we analyse the interactions between the different regulatory layers and provisions that govern the possibility of bringing IPRs under the protection of IIAs. After some general remarks on the references to IPRs in investment agreements (II), we focus on three main understandings of such interactions (III), namely delegation (by an investment agreement to domestic law), autonomy (of the definition of IPRs in investment agreements), and articulation (of all the relevant regulatory layers to circumscribe the scope of the legally-protected object). In a final section, we draw some conclusions with a view to guide current and future practice (IV).

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Correa & Jorge E. Viñuales, 2016. "Intellectual Property Rights as Protected Investments: How Open are the Gates?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 91-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:19:y:2016:i:1:p:91-120.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgw005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kinda Mohamadieh, 2021. "Investment Governance to Reverse Unjustified Privileging of Investors," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 64(1), pages 82-92, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:19:y:2016:i:1:p:91-120.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.