IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v18y2015i2p307-339..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges and Solutions for the China–US BIT Negotiations: Insights from the Recent Development of FTZs in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Huang

Abstract

Before conducting profound reforms of the trade and investment legal framework, China often implements the reforms on a small scale, generally in specified geographic zones, as testing grounds. From 2013 to 2015, China established four free trade zones (FTZs) as pilot projects to test how to update Chinese trade and investment law, boost China’s economy, and prepare China for high-standard BITs/FTAs negotiations. This article analyzes the interactions between China’s FTZs and the China–US BIT negotiations, and explores what insights gathered from China’s FTZs can provide a better approach to challenges in the China–US BIT negotiations. It concentrates on three issues of the BIT negotiations: non-conforming measures, pre-establishment national treatment, and transparency. For each issue, this article compares other BITs concluded by China and the USA and analyzes their differences, then it explores the reasons for the differences and how they can be reconciled by experiments in China’s FTZs, and finally it proposes solutions for the China–US BIT negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Huang, 2015. "Challenges and Solutions for the China–US BIT Negotiations: Insights from the Recent Development of FTZs in China," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 307-339.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:307-339.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgv018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:307-339.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.