IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v17y2014i3p679-700..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The WTO and Rules-Based Dispute Settlement: Historical Evolution, Operational Success, and Future Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • William J. Davey

Abstract

The World Trade Organization (WTO) has three main functions—first, negotiations on trade matters; second, oversight of existing WTO agreements; and third, dispute settlement. The WTO's negotiation function has broken down and its oversight function, while useful and valuable, is the least visible and least significant of the three functions. Thus, the credibility of the WTO as a functioning international organization essentially depends on ensuring the effectiveness of its dispute settlement function. This paper briefly traces the historical evolution of the dispute settlement system under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and then considers the current state of the WTO dispute settlement system—how effectively has it operated to date and what operational and procedural problems have arisen? It concludes by examining the challenges the WTO dispute settlement system will face in the coming years, considering, in particular, whether the system will be able to resolve effectively disputes between the major WTO powers—the United States, the European Union and China.

Suggested Citation

  • William J. Davey, 2014. "The WTO and Rules-Based Dispute Settlement: Historical Evolution, Operational Success, and Future Challenges," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 679-700.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:17:y:2014:i:3:p:679-700.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgu031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard M. Hoekman & Petros C. Mavroidis & Maarja Saluste, 2020. "Informing WTO Reform: Dispute Settlement Performance, 1995-2020," RSCAS Working Papers 2020/59, European University Institute.
    2. Louise Johannesson & Petros C. Mavroidis, 2016. "The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995-2016: A Data Set and its Descriptive Statistics," RSCAS Working Papers 2016/72, European University Institute.
    3. Johannesson, Louise & Mavroidis, Petros C., 2017. "The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995-2015: A Data Set and its Descriptive Statistics," Working Paper Series 1148, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:17:y:2014:i:3:p:679-700.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.