IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v17y2014i2p355-397..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diminished Ambitions? Public International Legal Authority in the Transnational Economic Era

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline E. Foster

Abstract

Ambition for employing public international legal authority as a means for the protection of human health and the environment appears to be diminishing in our transnationalist economic era. Practical and political challenges in defining the complex relationships between States and transnationally active commercial interests contribute to this. Emphasis on States’ domestic regulatory autonomy within contemporary international economic law is also a significant factor. This article canvasses three areas of international law and economic activity where the phenomenon of diminished ambition is manifest: responsibility, liability, and dispute settlement. Respectively, the article looks at developments in the three fields of law of the sea, international environmental law, and dispute settlement in the World Trade Organisation and through investment treaty arbitration. The article focuses on three specific topics within these three fields: the regulation of (i) deep seabed exploitation, (ii) possible risks associated with biotechnology, and (iii) tobacco regulation and public health. The article concludes that the result of our diminished ambition is to leave important areas of transnational economic activity unregulated, and encourages reflection on this phenomenon with a view to a strengthened approach in the areas where this will matter most.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline E. Foster, 2014. "Diminished Ambitions? Public International Legal Authority in the Transnational Economic Era," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 355-397.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:17:y:2014:i:2:p:355-397.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgu017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:17:y:2014:i:2:p:355-397.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.