Author
Abstract
With limited progress in the UN climate change negotiations, the EU has been looking at ways to further reduce global CO 2 emissions by extending the scope of its cap and trade system, most recently by including flights entering and leaving EU airspace. With the EU Aviation Directive entering into force on 1 January 2012, all airlines will need to hold permits to cover their CO 2 emissions for flights operating in EU airspace. For instance, Singapore Airlines will be required to hold permits for CO 2 emissions for its flights from Singapore to Frankfurt, which will include all CO 2 emissions over Singapore, third countries, the high seas and EU airspace. As climate change is a global challenge, national and regional efforts to reduce CO 2 emissions have an international impact by nature, particularly on trade. With the World Trade Organization (WTO) responsible for regulating world trade, this article analyses the consistency of the EU Aviation Directive with WTO rules. The EU's decision to include both non-EU and EU airlines under its cap and trade system is a response to the so-called carbon leakage and competitiveness issues that would have arisen if the scheme had been limited to EU airlines only. Carbon leakage arises when a carbon price leads domestic businesses to relocate to countries not pricing carbon or to increased imports of goods from countries not pricing carbon, resulting in no net reduction in global CO 2 emissions. Competitiveness issues occur when a carbon price increases the price of domestically produced goods, causing consumers to substitute with cheaper imports from countries not pricing carbon, ultimately harming domestic industry and undermining support for these policies. With airlines providing an important international services trade, including CO 2 emissions from aviation under the EU cap and trade system has important implications for international trade, particularly since air transport functions as an enabler of other forms of trade such as just-in-time manufacturing strategies, tourism, and business links. Despite the number of ways in which the Aviation Directive is in conflict with WTO rules, the article demonstrates that the type of WTO rules that the EU Aviation might violate are useful disciplines on how countries develop and apply climate change action that impedes international trade. Developing climate change measures consistently with WTO rules strikes an appropriate balance between giving WTO Members the policy space to take action to reduce CO 2 emissions while maintaining an open and non-discriminatory trading system that supports economic growth and global welfare. Oxford University Press 2012, all rights reserved, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Joshua Meltzer, 2012.
"Climate Change and Trade--The EU Aviation Directive and the WTO,"
Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 111-156, March.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:111-156
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Yang Xubiao, 2014.
"Alternative scheme of inclusion of international aviation in EU ETS and Chinese strategy,"
Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 3(3), pages 426-438, July.
- Armin Ibitz, 2015.
"Towards a global scheme for carbon emissions reduction in aviation: China’s role in blocking the extension of the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme,"
Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 113-130, June.
- Sun, Ya-Yen, 2014.
"A framework to account for the tourism carbon footprint at island destinations,"
Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 16-27.
- Yizhang He & Wei Song, 2022.
"Analysis of the Impact of Carbon Trading Policies on Carbon Emission and Carbon Emission Efficiency,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:111-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.