IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v13y2010i3p623-643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Soft Law Dominates International Finance--and not Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Brummer

Abstract

International financial law is in many ways a peculiar instrument of global economic affairs. Unlike international trade and monetary affairs, where global coordination is directed through formal international organizations, international financial law arises through inter-agency institutions with ambiguous legal status. Furthermore, the commitments made by regulatory officials participating in such forums are non-binding. This divergence is perplexing, especially when comparing international financial law to international trade. Both trade and finance comprise key areas of 'international economic law' and their rules have important distributive consequences for global markets and market participants. This article suggests that in order to understand soft law's value as a coordinating mechanism, an institutional assessment of the way that law is enforced is necessary. Under close inspection, international financial law departs from traditional public international law notions of informality and can in fact be 'harder' than its soft-law quality suggests. This feature helps explain why international financial rules, though technically non-binding, are often relied upon. The predominance of international soft law in finance does not, however, imply that it is without flaws, and this article highlights important structural deficiencies that the World Trade Organization, a more mature legal regime, largely avoids. Oxford University Press 2010, all rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Brummer, 2010. "Why Soft Law Dominates International Finance--and not Trade," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 623-643, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:623-643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgq026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mulcahy, Mark & Beck, Matthias & Carr, Michelle & Hourigan, Niamh, 2019. "Novel approaches to the regulatory control of financial services providers: The importance of cultural context," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    2. Picker Colin B., 2012. "A Legal Cultural Analysis of Microtrade," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 101-128, May.
    3. Daniele D’Alvia, 0. "The international financial regulation of SPACs between legal standardised regulation and standardisation of market practices," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    4. Daniele D’Alvia, 2020. "The international financial regulation of SPACs between legal standardised regulation and standardisation of market practices," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 107-124, June.
    5. Giselle Datz, 2021. "Ties that bind and blur: financialization and the evolution of sovereign debt as private contract," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 571-587, December.
    6. MILE 09, Maria Anna Corvaglia, 2013. "The Complementarity of Soft and Hard Law in Public Procurement: between Harmonization and Resiliance," Papers 550, World Trade Institute.
    7. Catherine C. Lai & Matthew C. Li, 2015. "Governing the Global Economy with the One-Size-Fits-All Model: From Ideology to Reality," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Dr. Samira Eyvazova, 2024. "International Legal Status Of The World Trade Organisation In The Context Of Economic Globalisation," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 10(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:623-643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.