IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v10y2007i1p117-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connecting or Compartmentalizing the WTO and United States Legal Systems? The Role of the Charming Betsy Canon

Author

Listed:
  • Arwel Davies

Abstract

Litigants before the US courts have frequently attempted to improve their legal position by relying on the Charming Betsy canon of statutory interpretation under which statutes which can be interpreted consistently with international obligations should be so interpreted. The argument has effectively been that the canon should be permitted to provide the interface between the World Trade Organization Agreements as interpreted by the World Trade Organization tribunals, and national statutes as interpreted by US executive agencies. The ease with which the canon can be stated belies the complexity and controversy now associated with its application. Some of the cases are arguably irreconcilable while academic opinion is similarly polarized by concerns about both the extent of judicial deference to agency interpretations, and about the slightest possibility of a more inquisitive approach. This article discusses how the canon has been applied and should be applied in domestic cases with a World Trade Organization dimension. A re-conceptualization of the canon's role in cases of this type is suggested. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Arwel Davies, 2007. "Connecting or Compartmentalizing the WTO and United States Legal Systems? The Role of the Charming Betsy Canon," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 117-149, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:117-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:117-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.