IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jfinec/v23y2025i2p297-297..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An L-Moment Approach for Portfolio Choice under Non-Expected Utility

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan Fallahgoul
  • Loriano Mancini
  • Stoyan Stoyanov

Abstract

We develop and apply a novel semi-parametric estimation method based on L-moments. Unlike conventional moments, L-moments are linear in the data and therefore robust to outliers. The estimation method provides a series expansion that quickly converges to the underlying return distribution and can be used when conventional moments do not exist. An extensive empirical analysis of portfolio choice under non-expected utility demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach. Empirical results show that our method copes well with estimation risk, yields stable portfolio returns, and reaps the information content of moment returns beyond order four.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan Fallahgoul & Loriano Mancini & Stoyan Stoyanov, 2025. "An L-Moment Approach for Portfolio Choice under Non-Expected Utility," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 297-297.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:23:y:2025:i:2:p:297-297.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jjfinec/nbae027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    choice under uncertainty; optimal portfolios; generalized disappointment aversion; L-moments;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:23:y:2025:i:2:p:297-297.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sofieea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.