IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jfinec/v22y2024i4p908-953..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Test for Trading Costs Effect in a Portfolio Selection Problem with Recursive Utility

Author

Listed:
  • Marine Carrasco
  • N’Golo Koné

Abstract

This article addresses a portfolio selection problem with trading costs on stock market. More precisely, we develop a simple generalized method of moments (GMM)-based test procedure to test the significance of trading costs effect in the economy with a flexible form of transaction costs. We also propose a two-step procedure to test overidentifying restrictions in our GMM estimation. In an empirical analysis, we apply our test procedures to the class of anomalies used in Novy-Marx and Velikov (2016). We show that transaction costs have a significant effect on investors’ behavior for many anomalies. In that case, investors significantly improve the out-of-sample performance of their portfolios by accounting for trading costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Marine Carrasco & N’Golo Koné, 2024. "Test for Trading Costs Effect in a Portfolio Selection Problem with Recursive Utility," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 908-953.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:22:y:2024:i:4:p:908-953.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jjfinec/nbad015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    portfolio selection; recursive utility; testing overidentifying restrictions; transaction costs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:22:y:2024:i:4:p:908-953.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sofieea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.