IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jeurec/v22y2024i5p2374-2413..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cardinal Sins? Conspicuous Consumption, Cardinal Status and Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Ed Hopkins

Abstract

This paper analyzes the social dilemma arising when a large population of individuals with differing incomes have concerns over relative deprivation in terms of visible or conspicuous consumption. These relative concerns are cardinal—people care about the size of the gap between own and others’ consumption—and include inequity aversion, where negative comparisons are more important than positive, rivalrous preferences, and comparison with mean consumption. The resulting Nash equilibrium is inefficient, with consumption generally exceeding the socially efficient level. In this model, the income distribution has a direct effect on behavior and under rivalrous preferences, an increase in incomes for the rich can raise consumption at all income levels and make almost everyone worse off.

Suggested Citation

  • Ed Hopkins, 2024. "Cardinal Sins? Conspicuous Consumption, Cardinal Status and Inequality," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(5), pages 2374-2413.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:22:y:2024:i:5:p:2374-2413.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvae025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:22:y:2024:i:5:p:2374-2413.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jeea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.