IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jeurec/v22y2024i4p1628-1677..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Absenteeism, Productivity, and Relational Contracts Inside the Firm

Author

Listed:
  • Achyuta Adhvaryu
  • Jean-François Gauthier
  • Anant Nyshadham
  • Jorge Tamayo

Abstract

We study relational contracts among managers using unique data that tracks transfers of workers across teams in Indian ready-made garment factories. We focus on how relational contracts help managers cope with worker absenteeism shocks, which are frequent, often large, weakly correlated across teams, and which substantially reduce team productivity. Together these facts imply gains from sharing workers. We show that managers respond to shocks by lending and borrowing workers in a manner consistent with relational contracting, but many potentially beneficial transfers are unrealized. This is because managers’ primary relationships are with a very small subset of potential partners. A borrowing event studies around main trading partners’ separations from the firm reinforces the importance of relationships. We show robustness to excluding worker moves least likely to reflect relational borrowing responses to idiosyncratic absenteeism shocks. Counterfactual simulations reveal large gains to reducing costs associated with forming and maintaining additional relationships among managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Achyuta Adhvaryu & Jean-François Gauthier & Anant Nyshadham & Jorge Tamayo, 2024. "Absenteeism, Productivity, and Relational Contracts Inside the Firm," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(4), pages 1628-1677.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:22:y:2024:i:4:p:1628-1677.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvae026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:22:y:2024:i:4:p:1628-1677.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jeea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.