IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jeurec/v20y2022i4p1619-1646..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency Under Endogenous Information Choice: A Price-Setting Application

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Gonzalo Llosa
  • Venky Venkateswaran

Abstract

Do private incentives to acquire information reflect the full social value of such information? We show that the answer to this question is typically negative in a canonical business cycle setting, where firms set prices under imperfect information about aggregate productivity. The wedge between private and social values of information is related to market power and ex-post inefficiencies in the use of information. The first reduces the private value of information (relative to its social value), while the second raises it. The overall sign of the inefficiency in information acquisition is therefore ambiguous. Implementing the informationally constrained efficient outcome requires a combination of fiscal and monetary policies—specifically, counter-cyclical revenue subsides as well as a monetary policy rule that targets a counter-cyclical aggregate price level.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Gonzalo Llosa & Venky Venkateswaran, 2022. "Efficiency Under Endogenous Information Choice: A Price-Setting Application," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(4), pages 1619-1646.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:20:y:2022:i:4:p:1619-1646.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvac010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Femminis, Gianluca & Piccirilli, Giulio, 2023. "Optimal policy with dispersed information and uncertain monetary transmission," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:20:y:2022:i:4:p:1619-1646.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jeea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.