IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jafrec/v34y2025i1p116-141..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Labour Platforms as Shock Absorbers: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Jones
  • Ivan Manhique

Abstract

Digital labour platforms have grown five-fold over the past decade, enabling significant expansion of gig work worldwide. We interrogate the critique that these platforms tend to amplify aggregate shocks for registered workers. Based on the universe of records from a matching platform for manual freelancers in Mozambique, we analyse how task supply and demand altered with the onset of COVID-19. Treating the pandemic as a structural break, which extends to an event study analysis, we find it was associated with a net increase in tasks demanded per worker, but no clear change in supply growth (new registrations). While these general trends are evident across multiple market segments, there is also evidence of relatively higher demand for female as compared to male workers during the pandemic. This suggests digital labour markets can help some workers adjust to economic shocks in low-income contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Jones & Ivan Manhique, 2025. "Digital Labour Platforms as Shock Absorbers: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mozambique," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 34(1), pages 116-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:116-141.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jae/ejae002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:116-141.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.