Author
Abstract
Existing studies of trade reform in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) -- and elsewhere -- are mainly qualitative in character, partly because of the difficulty of measuring the intensity of trade liberalisation. This paper uses a quantitative measure of trade liberalisation to provide statistical evidence on the conditions accounting for Africa's timid reforms. This measure captures the change in the tariff equivalent of all trade barriers and is therefore a summary indicator of the intensity of reform. The measure provides a fairly accurate description of the trade liberalisation experience of SSA countries, indicating that the most significant reforms occurred during the period 1986--90. The empirical model includes a set of hypotheses suggested both by theory and the anecdotal evidence of Africa's liberalisation experience. The empirical methodology distinguishes between the conditions that affect the likelihood of reform and the factors that determine the intensity of trade liberalisation. The empirical results justify this distinction. The findings suggest that larger aid flows, higher levels of urbanisation, a strong current account position and a relatively large manufacturing sector enhance the probability that trade reform is adopted. There is also some evidence that economic crises facilitate reform. Conversely, heavier fiscal dependence on trade taxes, greater import competition and a large government make trade reform less likely. However, only five of these factors -- current account balance, size of manufacturing sector, size of government, fiscal dependence on trade taxes and aid -- are found to exert a statistically significant effect on the intensity of trade reform. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Vinaye D. Ancharaz, 2003.
"Determinants of Trade Policy Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa,"
Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 12(3), pages 417-443, September.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:417-443
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:417-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.