IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v34y2025i1p118-143..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When inequality means equity: horizontal wage dispersion and the propensity to leave current employment across different organizational settings

Author

Listed:
  • Virgilio Failla
  • Nicolai J Foss
  • Francesca Melillo
  • Toke Reichstein

Abstract

Extant research holds that horizontal wage dispersion (i.e., wage dispersion within a hierarchical level in a firm) induces employees to leave their employment. Based on social comparison theory, we nuance this by theoretically and empirically uncovering contingencies under which horizontal wage dispersion is associated with employees staying in their current employment. Specifically, we focus on firm size and decentralization as relevant organizational contingencies. In large as opposed to small firms, employees’ productivity may vary significantly within hierarchical levels, causing employees to consider high horizontal wage dispersion as equitable. In decentralized firms, there is more delegation of responsibilities to employees at lower levels in the hierarchy, creating more room for individual differentiation in terms of contributions and thus legitimizing horizontal wage dispersion. Our empirical analysis based on matched employer–employee data from Denmark strongly supports our predictions. Our study reveals the organizational contingencies where horizontal wage dispersion can be used as a retention tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Virgilio Failla & Nicolai J Foss & Francesca Melillo & Toke Reichstein, 2025. "When inequality means equity: horizontal wage dispersion and the propensity to leave current employment across different organizational settings," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 34(1), pages 118-143.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:118-143.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtae023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:118-143.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.