IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v34y2025i1p1-24..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How heuristic pricing shapes the aggregate market: the “Cheap Twin Paradox”

Author

Listed:
  • Florian M Artinger
  • Gerd Gigerenzer

Abstract

How do firms set prices when faced with an uncertain market? We study the pricing strategies of car dealers for used cars using online data and interviews. We find that 97% of 628 dealers employ an aspiration-level heuristic similar to a Dutch auction. Dealers adapt the parameters of the heuristic—initial price, duration, and change in price—to their local market conditions, such as number of competitors, population density, and GDP per capita. At the same time, the aggregate market is described by a model of equilibrium price dispersion. Unlike the equilibrium model, the heuristic correctly predicts systematic pricing characteristics such as high initial price, price stickiness, and the “cheap twin paradox.” We also find first evidence that heuristic pricing can generate higher profits given uncertainty than the equilibrium strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian M Artinger & Gerd Gigerenzer, 2025. "How heuristic pricing shapes the aggregate market: the “Cheap Twin Paradox”," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 34(1), pages 1-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:1-24.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtae025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:1-24.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.