IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v33y2024i6p1532-1561..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too busy to balance? A longitudinal analysis of board of director busyness and firms’ ambidextrous orientation

Author

Listed:
  • Mariano L. M Heyden
  • Sebastian P. L Fourné
  • Lane Matthews
  • Ralf Wilden
  • Valentina Tarkovska

Abstract

Studies commonly highlight the informational upside of a board of directors’ connections to its external environment. Through their seats on multiple outside boards, directors are positioned to bring valuable informational resources to complex internal tasks on a focal firm. Crafting an ambidextrous strategic orientation is such a task, requiring great informational resourcing from a board to reconcile contradictions of exploration and exploitation. Yet, we assign an important boundary condition to this expectation by unpacking the idea of “busyness” as an important consideration in a board’s (in)ability to apply their informational resources. We complement Resource Dependence Theory with insights from bounded rationality and bounded reliability, to challenge the “more is better” assumption of the benefits of outside board seats. We develop corresponding hypotheses on the extent to which busyness of different director types (exemplified here via the busyness of non-executives, executives, and women directors) is related to the ambidextrous strategic orientation of a firm. Our results from a robust longitudinal panel analysis of publicly listed UK firms uncover complex patterns and provide evidence that boards with busy non-executives have a negative influence on the ambidextrous strategic orientation of firms, whereas boards with busy executive directors do not seem to exert an influence. We further find that boards with busy women directors show an inverted U-shaped relation with ambidextrous strategic orientation. We discuss implications for theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariano L. M Heyden & Sebastian P. L Fourné & Lane Matthews & Ralf Wilden & Valentina Tarkovska, 2024. "Too busy to balance? A longitudinal analysis of board of director busyness and firms’ ambidextrous orientation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 33(6), pages 1532-1561.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:33:y:2024:i:6:p:1532-1561.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtae018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:33:y:2024:i:6:p:1532-1561.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.