IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v33y2024i4p785-807..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communication costs in science: evidence from the National Science Foundation Network

Author

Listed:
  • Ezra G Goldstein

Abstract

How do communication costs affect the creation of scientific output? This study examines changes in scientific output and citation patterns following an institution’s connection to the National Science Foundation Network (NSFNET), an early version of the Internet. Established in 1985 to connect five NSF-sponsored supercomputers, the NSFNET national internet backbone quickly expanded to universities across the United States by linking existing and newly formed, wide-area regional computer networks. I estimate the effect of connection to the national internet backbone on citations per paper by exploiting plausibly exogenous variation in the connection times of the regional NSFNET networks. Following connection to the national NSFNET, average citations per paper increase by over 10% relative to the pre-connection mean. Subgroup analyses reveal that the net effect was driven largely by middle- and top-tier institutions. Finally, I show that NSFNET connection led to a decline in interdisciplinary citations and an increase in within-field citations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ezra G Goldstein, 2024. "Communication costs in science: evidence from the National Science Foundation Network," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 33(4), pages 785-807.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:785-807.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtad025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:785-807.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.