IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v23y2014i4p931-965..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local appeal and competition in multiple geographic markets: evidence from California retail banking between 1900 and 1990

Author

Listed:
  • Mi Feng

Abstract

This article assesses the effect of identity-related local appeal when firms compete in multiple geographic markets, and investigates how local appeal and multimarket advantages collectively determine the competitive strength of an organization. Compared with numerous studies that identified the benefits for being a chain system, recent researches on organizational identity highlight the social sanctions and discount when an organizational form does not fully conform to the norms and expectations at a given market. Empirical evidence from California retail banks in the 20th century demonstrates that organizational identity can be an important source of competitive strength even when considerable scale and scope advantages exist. However, when customers are not locally oriented, an organization’s identity-based appeal becomes less meaningful. Such a finding suggests the scope condition for organizational identity research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi Feng, 2014. "Local appeal and competition in multiple geographic markets: evidence from California retail banking between 1900 and 1990," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(4), pages 931-965.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:23:y:2014:i:4:p:931-965.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtt033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:23:y:2014:i:4:p:931-965.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.