IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v20y2011i6p1645-1675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: evidence from six industries

Author

Listed:
  • Franco Malerba
  • Richard Nelson

Abstract

This article claims that catching up is a learning process that requires a long time and often differs significantly across economic sectors in the factors leading to success or failure. We support these claims by examining the major factors affecting catching up by several countries in six industries: India and Brazil for pharmaceuticals; Korea, China, and Brazil for autos; India, Ireland, Israel, China, Brazil, and other countries for software; Korea and India for telecommunication equipment; Korea, Taiwan, China, and Malaysia for semiconductors; and China, Brazil, Costa Rica, and Nigeria for some agricultural crops. The article uses the framework of sectoral systems and argues that there are significant differences across these sectors in the variables and mechanisms involved in catching up. The article identifies the common factors affecting catching up and the main differences across sectoral systems. It then discusses the interplay between national systems and sectoral systems. Copyright 2011 The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Franco Malerba & Richard Nelson, 2011. "Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: evidence from six industries," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 20(6), pages 1645-1675, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:20:y:2011:i:6:p:1645-1675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtr062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:20:y:2011:i:6:p:1645-1675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.