IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v19y2010i5p1317-1329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The crisis, conventional economic wisdom, and public policy -super-1

Author

Listed:
  • Adair Turner

Abstract

This contribution, based on the presentation at the inaugural conference of the Institute for New Economic Thinking (Cambridge, April 2010), first, discusses the core building blocks of a conventional policy wisdom grounded in almost caricatural simplifications of "general equilibrium" research program. In that, intellectual conformism, interests, and ideology produced the dominant pre-crisis policy package. Second, it briefly reviews alternative streams of thought well present before the crisis that addressed major properties of actual economic systems such as asymmetric information, irrational behaviors, destabilizing speculation and herd-type dynamics. Against this background, third, it discusses some major current policy and institution-building issues, namely, the ramifications and consequences of the Too-Big-to-Fail argument; fractional reserve banking; and more generally, the inherent potential for instability and rent-extraction of "liquid" and seemingly "efficient" financial markets. Copyright 2010 The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Adair Turner, 2010. "The crisis, conventional economic wisdom, and public policy -super-1," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(5), pages 1317-1329, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:19:y:2010:i:5:p:1317-1329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtq042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alan Kirman, 2014. "Is it rational to have rational expectations?," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 13(1), pages 29-48, June.
    2. Giovanni Dosi & Andrea Roventini, 2019. "More is different ... and complex! the case for agent-based macroeconomics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-37, March.
    3. Sebastian Gechert, 2022. "Reconsidering macroeconomic policy prescriptions with meta-analysis [Statistical nonsignificance in empirical economics]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(2), pages 576-590.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:19:y:2010:i:5:p:1317-1329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.