IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v5y2010i3p158-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of daylight performance in scale models and a full-scale mock-up office

Author

Listed:
  • Dilay Kesten
  • Sebastian Fiedler
  • Felix Thumm
  • Andreas Löffler
  • Ursula Eicker

Abstract

The best way to improve daylight performance is to take a closer look on the behaviour of lighting the interior of sample building spaces. Scale models are commonly used to assess daylighting performance of buildings using an artificial sky for purpose of research and teaching as well as practice. In this paper the daylight assessment performance of the artificial sky at the Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Department of Architecture is evaluated. A method was developed, which allows analysing the main sources of errors by progressive stages. To analyse the main sources of error, comparisons were undertaken between the full-scale mock-up office, physical scale models and computer simulation models. The field measurements were performed in a South--South-East faced full-scale mock-up office. The four photosensors were placed on the middle axis of test office and scale models and the illuminance was measured from these points. The luminance distribution of the sky and the sun at the time of every single measurement was recorded with a luminance camera and fisheye lens. The computer simulation model was created in the Radiance program and used especially to archive sensitivity analyses of modelling errors. This study is an attempt to identify the main sources of experimental errors occurring in the assessment of building daylighting performance by means of scale models. It is aiming to find a correlation between luminance distribution of the sky and outside direct illuminance and internal illuminance levels and describes a strategy for energy efficient lighting design. Copyright The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Dilay Kesten & Sebastian Fiedler & Felix Thumm & Andreas Löffler & Ursula Eicker, 2010. "Evaluation of daylight performance in scale models and a full-scale mock-up office," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 158-165, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:5:y:2010:i:3:p:158-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctq023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:5:y:2010:i:3:p:158-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.