IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v1y2006i2p177-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflectance distributions and atrium daylight levels: a comparison between physical scale model and Radiance simulated study

Author

Listed:
  • S. Samant
  • B. Medjdoub

Abstract

The aim of this research was to carry out a comparative analysis between daylight factor (DF) values from physical model and Ecotect/Radiance for an atrium. Results show that Radiance underestimated the daylight factor in comparison with physical model measurements. The Radiance DF values could be multiplied by a factor of 1.2. Copyright , Manchester University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Samant & B. Medjdoub, 2006. "Reflectance distributions and atrium daylight levels: a comparison between physical scale model and Radiance simulated study," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 177-182, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:1:y:2006:i:2:p:177-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/1.2.177
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rastegari, Mahsa & Pournaseri, Shahnaz & Sanaieian, Haniyeh, 2023. "Analysis of daylight metrics based on the daylight autonomy (DLA) and lux illuminance in a real office building atrium in Tehran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:1:y:2006:i:2:p:177-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.