IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v18y2023ip423-432..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similarity characteristics of qualitative and quantitative regulation for adjustable ejector

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Yang
  • Xiaotong Ren
  • Yiqiao Li
  • Ning Wang
  • Kun Zhang
  • Shengqiang Shen

Abstract

In the new era of ejector technology entering into system scale from device scale. The methodology of regulation mode of an adjustable ejector has been summarized in this paper. The similarity in characteristics of qualitative and quantitative regulation under different operating modes are researched. The results show that both qualitative and quantitative regulation have the characteristics of ‘constant capacity’. Three different ‘constant-capacity’ phenomena in ejectors have been found, and the similarity indicates that the turbulent flow in ejectors has some statistical invariances in the form of mass flow rate of jetting flow. The ejector has the similar entrainment ability by increasing primary pressure by 43% in the qualitative regulation mode or enlarging the nozzle throat opening by 47% in the quantitative regulation mode under critical mode with similar underexpanded state. The advantages of adjustable ejectors have been promoted, in particular ±5% regulation accuracy or constant regulation ability, discharging improved ability by 80% in flow rate or 10% in pressure lifting ability in subcritical mode or primary flow rate saving ability by 25% or 13% in pressure lifting ability in critical mode.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Yang & Xiaotong Ren & Yiqiao Li & Ning Wang & Kun Zhang & Shengqiang Shen, 2023. "Similarity characteristics of qualitative and quantitative regulation for adjustable ejector," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 18, pages 423-432.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:18:y:2023:i::p:423-432.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctad030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:18:y:2023:i::p:423-432.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.